New kids on the political block
Tonight I had the pleasure of meeting some representatives of a fledgling political party called MIAK, which is the abbreviation for the organization's full Armenian name. In English it is know as the United Liberal National Party. It started off as a political "movement" then blossomed into a political party only recently. I met and spoke to two guys there, Levon and Davit, both of whom received some university-level education in the West, namely in England and the United States. They have "Western" style ways of thinking, which I cannot necessarily describe all too well but is obviously familiar to me, just by the way they express themselves openly and frankly rather than beat around the bush as most potential or supposed full-fledged Armenian politicians do. Basically I could not get much of an explanation as to what their specific agenda is as they do not really have one yet. They know that serious reforms are needed in Armenia and based on that premise they are trying to go after as many followers as possible, then form a consensus as to what key areas need to be focused upon.
They discussed two things that I thought were interesting. Firstly, Levon believes that there are no political parties per se in Armenia, only politicians that are either Soviet trained or Western trained. He said it makes no difference whether a person is a member of the Republican Party of Armenia, the ARF-Dashnaktsutiun, or Prosperous Armenia--if the individual has a Soviet way of thinking, that mentality will impede his or her abilities to bring about change, whatever that may be or entail. The second topic was regarding Nagorno-Karabagh. The two gentlemen, who are basically giving the opinion of the party, insist that arriving at an immediate solution to the Karabagh problem, in other words this year as the West particularly is hoping for, will not be enough to drastically improve Armenia's economy. Furthermore, it is not in the interests of Armenia to give up the status quo and simply gamble on the possibility of faster economic growth through regional integration. They also believe in cautious negotiations with Turkey, but not to develop relations without preconditions in order to simply open the Turkish-Armenian border, as the Armenian side has been suggesting for some time now.
In any case, I was very impressed with these guys. They seem like they know what they want to do but not necessarily know the correct approach yet. The party, which has around 600 members, will be contesting seats in the National Assembly elections in May, but they will have to win apparently 5 percent of the total vote in the proportional system to have representation. And they have lots of competition, including Raffi Hovhanisian's Heritage party. It should be very interesting to see where MIAK goes from here.
MIAK's Web site can be found in Armenian here.
They discussed two things that I thought were interesting. Firstly, Levon believes that there are no political parties per se in Armenia, only politicians that are either Soviet trained or Western trained. He said it makes no difference whether a person is a member of the Republican Party of Armenia, the ARF-Dashnaktsutiun, or Prosperous Armenia--if the individual has a Soviet way of thinking, that mentality will impede his or her abilities to bring about change, whatever that may be or entail. The second topic was regarding Nagorno-Karabagh. The two gentlemen, who are basically giving the opinion of the party, insist that arriving at an immediate solution to the Karabagh problem, in other words this year as the West particularly is hoping for, will not be enough to drastically improve Armenia's economy. Furthermore, it is not in the interests of Armenia to give up the status quo and simply gamble on the possibility of faster economic growth through regional integration. They also believe in cautious negotiations with Turkey, but not to develop relations without preconditions in order to simply open the Turkish-Armenian border, as the Armenian side has been suggesting for some time now.
In any case, I was very impressed with these guys. They seem like they know what they want to do but not necessarily know the correct approach yet. The party, which has around 600 members, will be contesting seats in the National Assembly elections in May, but they will have to win apparently 5 percent of the total vote in the proportional system to have representation. And they have lots of competition, including Raffi Hovhanisian's Heritage party. It should be very interesting to see where MIAK goes from here.
MIAK's Web site can be found in Armenian here.
Comments
As for Karabagh, of course they will be happy with the status quo. They didn't serve in the army and will not risk their asses if the war resumes. They'll keep getting their money from another Armenchik, who lives in London and also has a "Western mentality."
My impression though is that these MIAK guys are being treated with some jealosy by people of the same background. Whoever is behind the party, why wouldn't other "Western-style" people create a better political force and contend the elections? Isn't it because it's a really very difficult task and it's much easier to stay home and discuss rumours. More parties like MIAK and to some extent Raffi's party would contribute greatly to the improvement of Armenian politics.
On the first, Levon said that Armenchik was invited to one of their parties because he was a British Alumni member.
On the second, Levon's response was "unfortunately, we do not receive any support or assistance from Armen Sarkisyan at all."
Regarding the third point about eligibility, if I run into these guys again, I'll raise them. As you say, the issue of eligibility is a crucial one.
Already we have Samuel Babayan running even though he too hasn't resided in Armenia for the past 5 years.
The opposition don't seem to mind this, however, but it is a matter of law, for sure. The same problem arose in 2003 with opposition leader Aram Karapetyan.
He was confusingly allowed to run for President then, which requires 10 year residency, but paradoxically prevented from running for parliament the same year because it was paradoxically declared that he did not meet the 5 year requirement.
As you imply, however, and as many argue about Kocharian's eligibility in 1998, the decision is usually political. Of course, there's no excuse and no doubt, the international monitors will be on the case here if it's true.
Of course, the issue of residency in Armenia is a difficult one given the continued reliance on the propiska system.
This usually results in problems for those who don't know about factual registration, but it might also come into play here too.
Anyway, I'll raise the issue with MIAK if I speak to them again. Garo will probably do the same as well.
As for Karabakh, well, we spoke to them about that as well and they don't believe a war will break out again under any scenerio. Nevertheless, at a recent discussion on Karabakh, MIAK were described as being "more nationalist than the Dashnaks" on this issue.
Some other educated otherwise progressive young Armenians believed the same as MIAK, but when I raised this with someone else, they too came out with the same response.
In the event of a war it will not be these guys who do the fighting or dying. Nevertheless, rightly or wrongly, they don't believe Azerbaijan will disrupt the status quo or that the international community will allow them too even if they wanted.
I personally disagree because an arms race will either cripple Armenia economically or skirmishes run the risk of going out of control. Nevertheless, that is the position of the party.
What is even more interesting though is that it seems MIAK faces a strong jealousy from groups of similar background. I wonder what hampers all other modern-thinking people to get actively involved in politics. Obviously it’s very dangerous and difficult to form a party and contend elections. And it’s much easier to stay at home and discuss rumours – something that I am doing now and for that reason I am glad there are other people braver than me who went into all this mess to present their agenda. Thus, more parties like MIAK and to some extent Raffi’s party, better for Armenia.
Who created MIAK? Seems a group of educated people with strong western work experience and I find the rumors about different affiliation groundless.
MIAK is demonstrating its strong commitment to original ideology. Quite naturally, this generates a strong jealousy from groups of similar background.
However, the Jews would have reacted differently, at least would have tried to join the efforts of similarly positioned and modern-thinking people to get actively involved in politics together.
Being overseas, I would call all those concerned about Armenia#s future, to provide support and give a chance to deliver. At least this party seems to be among those deserving public confidence.
Good luck!!!
You know what Armenia needs....? positive thinking, proactive movements and more people like those of MIAK, who act! Good luck guys! You'll do great, coz you have many supporters!
Please forward our greetings and gratitude to Garo for a nice
blog.
Just to make it clear once again. Armen Gevorgyan is of course no member of
BAA. He was invited as a guest speaker to one of the guest-speaker nights within the series arranged by BAA over the winter. Other guest speakers on other dates were Nikol Pashinyan, Shavarsh Kocharyan, Vardan Oskanyan, Rafii Hovhannisyan etc. So one can well affiliate MIAK with all these other guys too just on the ground that they accepted BAA NGO's invitation to speak about something.
MIAK is a group of people that think about themselves as "azgi serutsq" with of course no proof of that. Being educated in UK or Westin general or working in BP with official dress code does not make anybody a member of elite. The main characteristics of these guys is that they are scared of responsibility. Read their program, no responsibility. "We aspire a pro-Armenian solution of Karabakh problem" (citation from their program) :) Come on guys, is there any Armenian in this country, that does not? And if you watch carefully what they say apropos main issues, you will see no difference from the words of Kocharyan, Oskanyan, etc.
But the biggest danger, however, is that these guys are politically illiterate. You do not learn how to do politics by reading books published at Rutgers or Harvard, and sitting in your comfortable offices, writing with Parker pens. You can write tons of reformatory platform, have nice talks about infrastructural, economic blablabla reforms... But that's not politics, guys. You gotta get into the country's everyday dirt, to understand processes and to lead and change them. Something that MIAK bunch will never do, as they have paid enough for their suits.
good, very good! we’ll see what they do. Good luck, honestly!
Comment by petrarka — April 16, 2007 @ 1:16 am
I was very impressed by both the post and the dicription of the MIAK’s intensions of liberal reforms in Armenia. I went through MIAK’s web site (www.miak.am) and I must say that these guys really know what ther are doing. The official program of the party seems to offer points that might be extremely helpful to develop economic and social state of the country based on liberal and progressive values. I think that young and inteligent people must support MIAk as much as possible, so to assist the memebrs to reach their goals, which I believe will have a great inpact on the prosperity of the overall country.
Guys, I support you and I will advice all my firends to be there to help you realize you mission and objectives.
T.
Comment by Tizziano — April 20, 2007 @ 2:56 pm
Another problem that Armenians have is the jealousy! The comment of Arman: “Being educated in UK or Westin general or working in BP with official dress code does not make anybody a member of elite”. Dear Arman, you should be happy that these educated people decided to return to Armenia, that they are still living here and even more - trying to change something! Or may be you prefer to vote for those who are presenting TVs and hair-driers to the people with Alzheimer's disease?
Good luck MIAK!!!
As far as I read the program, there is a proposal of making Armenian army contractual, thus professional. It reflects the whole concept beyond this white-collar status quo, and I think it's fair: EVERYBODY HAS TO DO HIS JOB. If your job is to fight, go fight, those who are educated dont have to.
About Armenchik's ass-kissing. Well, I doubt that. I was present to one of MIAK's Friday Nights. They are too ambitious to kiss anyone's ass, and that's what is positive about them.
And to you, Ashot jan, I would suggest to re-think your attitute towards asses, may be you have a problem with this part of human body?
Well, in actual fact, people don't make the choice when it comes to war. Politicians do.
Also, the military is not a professional army so it will be young conscripts who do the fighting and dying if that time comes.
Meanwhile, the sons of officials or those with money will bribe their way, or use their connections, of getting anywhere close to the front line, or indeed, a uniform let alone a gun.
Popular Moscow showman not to participate in parliamentary election but to support his brother's party
Popular Moscow showman not to participate in parliamentary election but to support his brother's partyThe popular Moscow showman, one of the ideological inspirers of and organizers of the popular Russian show
"Comedy Club" Garik Martirossyan has resolved to withdraw his candidacy from the proportional list of the United Liberal-National party, the leader of which is the native brother of the showman, Levon Martirossyan. According to Garik Martirossyan, he will stay in Yerevan until parliamentary election and actively support and
participate in the election campaign of the United Liberal-National party.